(from 2019)
I will always retain fond memories of Rachael. We
corresponded regularly for ten years, both on history matters and other matters
too. We emailed, we shared blog comments, and tweeted too.
One of my correspondents who contacted me
back-channel could not believe she was only 41. He thought, from her insights
and comments, that she was much older. She was a tenacious researcher who
argued her point of view passionately. I must confess that I didn’t always
agree with her point of view, but that’s human life for you, and I couldn’t
fault her conviction and turn of phrase to express it.
In fact my alter ego, Occasional Reader, came about
through disagreement. It was friendly disagreement, but disagreement none the
less. Many years ago on this blog, Rachael wrote a long piece about how she
viewed certain members of a religious group. She’d had some bad personal
experiences. I couldn’t argue about her experiences because I wasn’t there and
I felt for her, because what happened just wasn’t right. However, I did feel
that others were being “tarred with the same brush.” I broke one of my own
rules and decided to respond online and on the defensive. I was an “occasional
reader” of her blog, so to preserve my anonymity, that’s what I called myself.
Back came a lengthy well-written response on the blog. I still didn’t agree
with her I must confess, but almost immediately. I decided that an open forum
was not the place to discuss such matters and the conversation went
back-channel.
Not very long after I was invited to submit
something for her blog, as far away from religious history as could be. So I started
writing – sometimes occasionally, sometimes frequently. Rachael had soon worked
out who I was, and that was OK, and actually – being fairly adept at sleuthing
– I soon found out her real name too. But I never told her or anyone else for
that matter. She had a right to her privacy.
So the years went by. I wrote and researched for
Rachael and Bruce and also followed up the quirks of history that appealed to
me. I’d written on this subject for many years in different contexts, and had a
wide range of contacts, but this project provided me some regular focus and
continuity. We shared resources and Bruce and Rachael entrusted me with rare
materials that needed checking.
On the pixie blog I learned about Rachael’s family,
and their nicknames. I learned about her book collecting and library – a
passion I shared. I learned about her holding down several jobs while seriously
ill, being determined not to give in to the adversity of her medical condition
until it was absolutely forced upon her. I learned about the goats, the family
history back in the old country, and all the artwork of pixies and children. I learned
about her eclectic music tastes, from swing to hymns to country and western (come
back Marty Robbins, all is forgiven). I received and enjoyed Pixie Warrior. In
return I told slightly exaggerated tales of our family’s doings, with an
occasional serious rant on something interspersed. So Rachael knew of Mrs O, my
wife Lyn, and also had her own correspondence with my daughter, Amy, who sings
and records. We sing too, after a fashion, but Amy REALLY sings.
So it is the end of an era. I am sorry never to have
met her in person, but the global village of today means that most of our
contacts are probably people we will never actually meet. I put that right with
some when I visited historic sites in America in 2014, and who knows, one day
maybe a book will come out of that. But Washington State was just too far away,
and anyway, I think the distance and anonymity suited Rachael still. We will
all miss her.
Our lovely and unforgettable Princess.
ReplyDeleteHow much I miss her, how much tears in my eyes. (Acts 24:15)